Saying his responsibilities have grown since he began overseeing the claims process of BP's (NYSE:BP) compensation fund, the energy giant announced it has given fund administrator Kenneth Feinberg an increase in compensation from $850,000 to $1.25 million a month.
The White House and BP appointed Feinberg to oversee payments from the fund to individuals and businesses. Since Feinberg took over the payment process, approximately $3.6 billion has been paid out to 172,000 claimants. Other than payments to individuals and businesses, the fund also can be used to pay for environmental damages and state and local response costs, although in those cases Feinberg does not oversee the payments.
The raise in pay was made retroactive to January 15, and extends to the end of 2011.
BP closed Friday at $46.87, gaining $0.06, or 0.13 percent.
Monday, March 28, 2011
BP (BP) Hands Feinberg Big Raise
Tuesday, March 1, 2011
BP (BP) Claims Fund, Feinberg Hit with Fraud Lawsuit
The BP (NYSE:BP) $20 billion claims fund and administrator Kenneth Feinberg have been hit with a lawsuit claiming fraud and negligence over distribution of the funds.
A firm called Pinellas Marine Salvage has alleged Gulf Coast Claims Facility and its administrator, Kenneth Feinberg, hasn't acted in the best interests of victims.
Pinellas Marine Salvage, which says Feinberg and the fund "circumvent many of the rights provided to victims of the BP oil spill under the Oil Pollution Act of 1990," is seeking economic, compensatory, and punitive damages in the complaint.
Anyone can file a lawsuit making any claim they want, but so far there hasn't been a shred of evidence Feinberg has willingly of purposefully paid victims of the Gulf spill less than should have been.
As a matter of fact, Feinberg has lamented for a long time that a large percentage of claimants don't have the documentation to prove they are owed what they assert.
Much of this is precipitated by greedy lawyers looking to cash in on the pain of the victims, attempting to smear the overall process in order to pressure claimants to use them to represent them, rather than go through the claims process.
Monday, February 14, 2011
Is BP (NYSE:BP) Oil-Spill Fund, Feinberg Criticism Justified?
The more complaints about the compensation fund from BP (NYSE:BP) to pay victims of the oil spill, and Kenneth Feinberg, who administers the fund grow, the appearance they may not be justified grows with them.
While the media focuses on the whining and complaining, few focus on the substance of the complaints.
When you read the stories about whether the process if fair or not, you rarely, if ever, read about specific cases where someone was denied. You just hear about the whining and the fact BP damaged Gulf businesses when the oil well leaked. Who doesn't already know that?
The two alleged problems are lack of transparency and slow pace of the procedures. But some politicians are calling for government oversight, which anyone with a brain knows would slow down the process even more.
Feinberg says this, "It is clear to me that when 90,000 citizens of the Gulf accept a quick payment, it has nothing to do with economic compulsion but is the result of either having been adequately compensated or simply not being able to document any further damage."
The reason I believe Feinberg is telling the truth is it would be extremely easy to counter his assertions by those claiming they aren't being compensated for their losses to show proof of that.
It seems no one is showing proof, but again, just whining that they didn't get anything from the fund. You have to have suffered a real loss to get compensated. How hard is that to understand?
I think what's happening here is people think the BP fund is government money, and are attempting to game the system like many do with tax dollars.
As far as transparency, that seems to come from the apparent lack of explanation as to why people aren't receiving a payout.
But that doesn't seem to fly either. Feinberg has said many times people who get paid require documentation to prove they suffered loss. Simple enough. All people and businesses have to do is prove it.
The schizophrenic side of it is people are now complaining they're being "forced" to accept a quick payout. So you have people complaining the process it too slow while complaining the payout is too quick at the same time. Bizarre to say the least.
It also seems the cash-strapped states may be taking advantage of the BP oil spill and fund in attempts to get money to their disgruntled people by creating a scenario that doesn't exist.
If this was such a big story, there would be tons of people showing the media the paperwork proving they were unjustly denied money by Feinberg.
Until that happens, this isn't a story but a witch hunt. Show the proof or quit writing the nonsense.
This isn't to be sympathetic with BP, as they brought this upon themselves through the lack of oversight of their people and low safety standards.
But that doesn't mean because they caused damage to some that they have to pay money out to all. From these unsubstantiated assertions you would think that's exactly what's expected.
Tuesday, February 8, 2011
Feinberg Says Gulf Will Recover from BP (NYSE:BP) Oil Spill by 2012
After pouring over as much data he can find on the effects of BP's (NYSE:BP) oil spill on the Gulf of Mexico, Kenneth Feinberg, who oversees the $20 billion compensation fund, said he sees the Gulf recovering by 2012.
Feinberg said by that time the economy should be healthier and the effects of the spill to have dissipated.
Feinberg says, "For every claimant who is eligible other than oyster harvesters, we believe at the GCCF that it is reasonable to conclude full recovery by the end of 2012. There will be gradual recovery over the next two years."
Responding to criticism and uncertainty as to whether or not victims have been properly compensated, Feinberg noted, "If people feel that I have misread the available data or have underestimated the long term data don't take the final payment."
Lawyers have been circling around the victims, attempting to portray Feinberg in a negative light, as they want more of the money the fund offers, which they'll get if victims go that route.
The problem is even if the lawyers win more money for them, after the fees they charge and possibly years down the road, they may get nothing more than they would have received if they deal directly with Feinberg. The only ones getting more money will more than likely be lawyers.
BP (NYSE:BP) closed Monday at $46.54, gaining $0.51, or 1.11 percent.
Thursday, January 20, 2011
BP (NYSE:BP) Claims Processor Kenneth Feinberg Asked to be More Responsive by Florida AG
Kenneth Feinberg, who runs the BP (NYSE:BP) claims fund, and is over the claims processing portion of it, was asked to be more responsive and clear about the process in Florida.
Florida's attorney general Pam Bondi said the responses by Feinberg and his team to businesses in Florida is at the top of her agenda.
Part of the clarity aspect probably comes in response to changes Feinberg made when complaints arose, which seems to have clouded the situation, rather than expediate it.
Bondi said, "You are going to see us get a lot more aggressive on that issue. There has to be more transparency in the claims process."
The problem for Feinberg is he just can't reach all the people and businesses to communicate, as he's been holding one meeting after another in attempts to improve the process and listen to complaints.
It seems he may have even said too much, as far as the process itself, which may cause confusion to those attempting to receive money from legitimate claims.
I'm not sure what it is Bondi feels Feinberg is being non-responsive about, as it seems he's continually in the press and meetings discussing the overall fund.
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
Lawyers Battling Over BP (NYSE:BP), Feinberg Concerning Compensation Fund
Lawyers are starting to fight one another over the BP (NYSE:BP) compensation fund being run by Kenneth Feinberg.
These are lawyers opposing one another, but two groups of lawyers representing plaintiffs.
When you come down to it, regardless of the smokescreen being thrown out by the 17-member plaintiffs' steering committee, it's about them losing business to the compensation fund, as those who make a deal with BP via Feinberg and the fund, aren't allowed to sue BP later on.
In December the lawyers filed a motion asking U.S. District Court Judge Carl Barbier to order Feinberg to make changes to the release form, adding of course that they contact a lawyer before making a permanent decision to accept a final payment.
This is a roundabout way of attempting to force BP, via their release form, to be a marketing arm of the lawyers.
When you consider the 30 to 40 percent the lawyers will extract from the plaintiffs, it's hard to see what benefit, if any, they get from hiring a lawyer, along with the potential long period of time before they see any money at all. How much is that time period being measured in value to the plaintiffs?
After all, what lawyer is going to recommend the plaintiffs to settle with BP via the compensation fund and give up their huge cut?
The other group of lawyers opposing the 17, are actually six firms, who want to keep things running as they are.
While there is a possibility these lawyers may get a cut from any distribution from claims, it isn't necessarily so, and would probably be much less per individual or entity than those who are fighting to get access to every person seeking compensation.
Those working directly with the fund will receive compensation which totally goes to them and not to lawyers.
In the end, this is nothing other than about how much more money the 17 lawyers can get from potential clients.
![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)